It's essential for authors submitting a manuscript to JITA journal to ensure that their work meets the requirements set forth by the journal. These requirements include originality, authorship, and responsible conduct, contribute to maintaining the credibility and high standards of the publication. Authors must submit only original manuscripts not being published elsewhere or are under review for another publication. It is also the authors' responsibility to determine if any material, content, or photographs in their manuscript require the prior consent of other parties. If so, they should obtain it and submit it with their manuscript. JITA's policy is to prevent duplicate publications and ensure fairness by prohibiting the parallel submission of a manuscript to multiple journals or primary publications. Rejected manuscript authors can submit to another journal or primary publication. The Author must provide an objective discussion of the results and their significance. The manuscript has to provide a sufficient level of detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. The Author is responsible to ensure that any used work or words of others are appropriately cited or quoted. The authorship of a manuscript should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution, with the main author being the corresponding author. Other individuals who have made significant contributions to the manuscript should be listed as co-authors. If other people have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research, they should be named in an "Acknowledgment" section. The corresponding author must ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose any conflict of interest that can influence the presented results or their interpretation. If the work involves dangerous procedures and/or equipment that may have any unusual hazards due to their use, the authors must identify these in the manuscript. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, the author should promptly notify the journal’s Editor-in-Chief or publisher and cooperate with them either to retract the paper or to publish an appropriate erratum. In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the Editor-in-Chief, Managing Editors and Editorial Board, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. These may include the prompt publication of an erratum or, in the most severe cases, the complete retraction of the affected work. Authors are free to deposit published papers on their institutional or any other repository of their choice, pending that the version of the manuscript includes the journal name, DOI number, and publication information (volume, issue, eID).

Reviewers will assist the Editors in making editorial decisions and also assist the author(s) in improving the manuscript. Any manuscripts received for review will be treated as confidential documents and not be shown to or discussed with a third party, except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief. By accepting to review the manuscript, the reviewer is legally obliged to keep all data confidential until publishing of the manuscript. Reviews will be conducted objectively and any personal criticism of the author or author's institution is inacceptable and prohibited. Reviewers have to express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments. If any observation, derivation, or argument found in the manuscript had been previously reported, such claim must be accompanied by the relevant citation and proof. A reviewer should also call to the Editor's attention if any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published data and/or manuscript of which they have personal knowledge. If a reviewer feels unqualified or unable to complete a timely review of a manuscript, they should inform the Editor-in-Chief promptly. It will allow alternative reviewers to be contacted and ensure a thorough and fair review process. Reviews must be objective and avoid personal criticism of the author or their institution. Reviewers have to express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments. It is mandatory to cite and provide conclusive evidence for any observation, derivation, or argument found in the manuscript that has been previously reported. Reviewers should alert the editor if they notice substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript and any published data or manuscripts they know of. This helps maintain research and publishing integrity. Therefore, it is the duty of reviewers to be assertive and ensure that the manuscripts they review are entirely original and do not contain any plagiarized content. Conflict of Interest JITA is a distinguished academic journal that upholds the highest standards of ethical conduct and publication policies. The diligent reviewers exercise considerable effort to identify potential issues like plagiarism, incomplete attestation, dual or parallel submission, or publication breaches. It helps to maintain the journal's esteemed reputation and ensure that it remains a reliable source for academic research. To ensure fairness and impartiality in our review process, JITA takes proactive measures to avoid assigning reviewers with any existing or perceived conflicts of interest. To ensure that the review process remains unbiased and fair, JITA avoids reviewers who have had recent or ongoing collaborations with the authors, a history of disputes, or a financial stake in the outcome. It helps to maintain the integrity of the review process and ensure that the evaluation is based solely on the quality of the manuscript. This approach helps to ensure that the review process remains transparent and objective. Additionally, we expect our reviewers to disclose any potential conflicts of interest relevant to the manuscript under consideration. In the interest of transparency, JITA automatically excludes members of the Editorial Board or their close collaborators who submit manuscripts to JITA from the review process. Similarly, JITA never sends manuscripts to reviewers from the author's institution to ensure a fair and unbiased review process. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of ethical conduct and publication policy, and we hope that all authors and reviewers will work with us to achieve these goals. Thank you for your attention to this matter.